Compliance Layer
Compliance as Architecture
Compliance is enforced through structure, not policy manuals or training slides. Architectural constraints make certain violations structurally impossible rather than procedurally discouraged.
Separation of Responsibilities
Responsibilities are explicitly attributed. The system is responsible for execution within bounds. Humans are responsible for exceptions requiring judgment. Advisors are responsible for engagement context. Employers are responsible for policy direction.
Auditability and Traceability
Decisions are logged. Inputs are preserved. Outputs are attributable to the rules and data that produced them. Historical state is recoverable for regulatory review.
Jurisdictional Awareness
The system is built with jurisdictional sensitivity. Deployment respects local requirements. Scope is intentionally bounded to avoid overreach into areas where regulatory clarity is limited.
Detailed Compliance Documentation
The following detailed policies describe how compliance is implemented in practice:
- HIPAA Compliance Controls
Technical and administrative safeguards, PHI inventory, and access control implementation.
- Breach Notification Procedure
Risk assessment, notification timelines, response procedures, and remediation steps.
Versioned Procurement Artifacts
Public trust artifacts are versioned and date-stamped for legal and security diligence.
- Data Processing Addendum (Template) (v1.0)
- Subprocessors List (v1.0)
- Retention and Deletion Schedule (v1.0)
- Breach Notification Policy (v1.0)
- Cross-Border Transfer Terms (v1.0)
Identity controls and SSO/SCIM roadmap: /legal/identity