Skip to main content

Compliance Layer

Compliance as Architecture

Compliance is enforced through structure, not policy manuals or training slides. Architectural constraints make certain violations structurally impossible rather than procedurally discouraged.

Separation of Responsibilities

Responsibilities are explicitly attributed. The system is responsible for execution within bounds. Humans are responsible for exceptions requiring judgment. Advisors are responsible for engagement context. Employers are responsible for policy direction.

Auditability and Traceability

Decisions are logged. Inputs are preserved. Outputs are attributable to the rules and data that produced them. Historical state is recoverable for regulatory review.

Jurisdictional Awareness

The system is built with jurisdictional sensitivity. Deployment respects local requirements. Scope is intentionally bounded to avoid overreach into areas where regulatory clarity is limited.

Detailed Compliance Documentation

The following detailed policies describe how compliance is implemented in practice:

Versioned Procurement Artifacts

Public trust artifacts are versioned and date-stamped for legal and security diligence.

Open enterprise trust center

Identity controls and SSO/SCIM roadmap: /legal/identity